> What specific "general notes" lead you to believe that these existing
> roof rurlins will NOT comply?
>
> --- On *Wed, 6/11/08, Drew Morris /<dmorris@bbfm.com>/* wrote:
>
> From: Drew Morris <dmorris@bbfm.com>
> Subject: 1985 pre-manufactured building
> To: "SEAINT" <seaint@seaint.org>
> Date: Wednesday, June 11, 2008, 7:10 PM
>
>
The General Notes give the design snow load of 38 psf. I can get the
purlins to only work at Fy=50 ksi, but not at 33 ksi.
New buildings in the area are designed for a minimum of 60 psf, so we
are evaluating the options for upgrading the building.
The frames are of more concern, I know the purlins need to be infilled.
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*
http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********