Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Re: wind continued...

My rule of thumb is that if at least one person along the line
(architect, GC, truss mfr., etc) doesn't think I'm an idiot then
clearly, I'm doing something wrong. :)

Chris

On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Andrew Kester, PE <akester@cfl.rr.com> wrote:

> Now since trusses are designed by another engineer, that could be said it is
> up to their judgment, though I am the EOR I could insist on one type of wind
> design versus the other. But I also don't need a truss mfr telling the GC
> the structural engineer is ridiculous and an idiot, and then they tell my
> client the same....
>

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********