Saturday, January 26, 2008

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

IBC2009? It will be
2011+ before it's official as the default method.

Something might happen before then, like an addendum
or local modification. Hopefully.



MJ

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Hi, Steve.

Of course you're not wrong.

Try IR 16-7.
:o)
--
T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E.
ALLEN DESIGNS
Consulting Structural Engineers


---- Steve Gordin <sgordin@sgeconsulting.com> wrote:
> Bill,
>
> It appears to apply strictly to single-story buildings with 2,160 sq. ft of the floor area.
> I don't think it will really help anybody, am I wrong?
>
> V. Steve Gordin, Ph.D.,
> Registered Structural & Civil Engineer
> Irvine CA
> Tel. 949.552.5244
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: t.w.allen@cox.net
> To: seaint@seaint.org
> Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 16:43
> Subject: Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces
>
>
> Mark -
>
> You're referring to IR 16-4, right?
>
> If so, I believe James Lai implied today at the seismic seminar in Long Beach that this method has been approved for the IBC 2009 and ASCE 7-10.
> --
> T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E.
> ALLEN DESIGNS
> Consulting Structural Engineers
>
>
> ---- Mark Johnson <markajohn@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Check out the DSA Alternative Wind method that Gerard Madden
> > found in this file.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/pubs/IR_Manual_updated_01-02-08.pdf
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > MJ
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> > * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> > *
> > * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> > * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> > * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> > *
> > *

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> > *
> > * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> > * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> > * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> > * site at: http://www.seaint.org

> > ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
>
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> * site at: http://www.seaint.org

> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Bill,
 
It appears to apply strictly to single-story buildings with 2,160 sq. ft of the floor area. 
I don't think it will really help anybody, am I wrong?
 
V. Steve Gordin, Ph.D.,
Registered Structural & Civil Engineer
Irvine CA
Tel. 949.552.5244 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 16:43
Subject: Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Mark -

You're referring to IR 16-4, right?

If so, I believe James Lai implied today at the seismic seminar in Long Beach that this method has been approved for the IBC 2009 and ASCE 7-10.
--
T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E.
ALLEN DESIGNS
Consulting Structural Engineers


---- Mark Johnson <markajohn@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Check out the DSA Alternative Wind method that Gerard Madden
> found in this file.
>
>

>
>
> http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/pubs/IR_Manual_updated_01-02-08.pdf
>
>

>
>
> MJ
>
>
>
>
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> *   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> *   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> *   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> *   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> *   Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> *   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> *   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> *   site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Mark -

You're referring to IR 16-4, right?

If so, I believe James Lai implied today at the seismic seminar in Long Beach that this method has been approved for the IBC 2009 and ASCE 7-10.
--
T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E.
ALLEN DESIGNS
Consulting Structural Engineers


---- Mark Johnson <markajohn@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
> Check out the DSA Alternative Wind method that Gerard Madden
> found in this file.
>
>
>
>
>
> http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/pubs/IR_Manual_updated_01-02-08.pdf
>
>
>
>
>
> MJ
>
>
>
>
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> *

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> * site at: http://www.seaint.org

> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Check out the DSA Alternative Wind method that Gerard Madden
found in this file.



http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/pubs/IR_Manual_updated_01-02-08.pdf



MJ

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Tony,


I think the load case which considers area B also includes
the larger pressure on area A.

The total
pressure will average greater than that on area B for this load case.


HTH

MJ

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

Tony,
To my understanding this minimum 10 psf requirement is applied as a separate load case in addition to the other normal load cases.  So you don't need to use 10 psf for these zones but to compare your load cases with this minimum 10 psf. load case to get the governing loads for your design. 
 
Freeman Tang, SE.
Gouvis Engineering
Newport Beach, CA
 

ASLCSE@aol.com wrote:
It is my understanding that the minimum wind force used shall be 10 psf. Is that for the overall structure?
If Zones "B" & "C" (sloped roof ) in Table 6.4, page 38 show a value less 10 psf, do I have to use the 10 psf for these zones?
 
Thanks for the upcoming responses
 
Antonio S. "Tony" Luisoni
Consulting SE
Granada Hills, CA





Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.

ASCE 7-05 Wind Forces

It is my understanding that the minimum wind force used shall be 10 psf. Is that for the overall structure?
If Zones "B" & "C" (sloped roof ) in Table 6.4, page 38 show a value less 10 psf, do I have to use the 10 psf for these zones?
 
Thanks for the upcoming responses
 
Antonio S. "Tony" Luisoni
Consulting SE
Granada Hills, CA



RE: Decoupling of anchor bolts

Harold,

 

I have a late quick side question here.  If you do not put shear in anchor bolts, how do you specify and detail a connection for a pre-engineered metal building?   I’ve never seen a PEMB supplier install shear lugs.  Is there some other detail you would use in this application?

 

Thanks for your insight.

 

Rich

 

From: Harold Sprague [mailto:spraguehope@hotmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 7:55 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: RE: Decoupling of anchor bolts

 

Unless the shear force is small, I do not resist shear with anchor bolts.  Any time that I have a significant tensile force in anchor bolts, I require them to be pretensioned.  And any time I have a pretensioned anchor bolt, I require the shafts to be greased and taped to preclude bond. 
 
Generally we do not account for the contribution in the stretch of an anchor bolt to lateral drift or deflection of cantilevered columns or braced frames.  It can be significant.  If you pretension the anchor bolts you eliminate the stretch contribuition to drift of the anchor bolt.
 
I have done this for buildings, power plants, machine bases, etc.

Regards,
Harold Sprague

> Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2008 11:18:37 -0800
> From: markajohn@yahoo.com
> Subject: RE: Decoupling of anchor bolts
> To: seaint@seaint.org
>
>
>
> Harold,
>
>
>
>
>
> What applications do you do this for? Just large bolts with little or no shear
> force?
>
>
>
>
>
> I have been thinking about anchor bolts more than usual
> after following the list this past week.
> BTW, thanks to all who wrote about anchors etc. recently!
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
> MJ
>
>
>
>
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> * site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********


Shed those extra pounds with MSN and The Biggest Loser! Learn more.

Re: CMU Infills

your teacher is right : the infills will increase the rigidity and decrease the period T .
so the base shear V will be bigger .
but sooner the in infills will crack  not  crushed  and will lose there rigidity .
 
infills crushed depends on the movment of the structure .
it is better to conect the infills by dowels or steel angle with bolts.
 
 
           Dr . hamida - Syria
 
 
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:02 PM
Subject: CMU Infills

Dear Fellow Engineers,
 
     My RC design teacher has taught us has to ignore the effect of CMU infills on a RC frame because they will be crushed during a seismic event. Recent seminars I attended shows that cmu infills interferes with  frame action thus attracting more shear. Is there any code provision regarding on how to treat cmu infills in relation with RC frames or steel frames?
 
       Your assistance will much appreciated. Thanks.
 
 
     Sincerely,
 
     Alex C. Nacionales.
      
 
     
 
    

Friday, January 25, 2008

Re: Aspect Ratio of Light Framed Shearwalls

Or NDS SECTION 4.3.4 TABLE 4.3.4 NOTE NUMERO UNO.
 


 
On Jan 25, 2008 1:11 PM, Tom Skaggs <tom.skaggs@apawood.org> wrote:
See Table 2305.3.4, footnote a of the 2006 IBC.

Tom

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Skaggs, Ph.D., P.E.
Manager, Product Evaluation
Technical Services Division
APA - The Engineered Wood Association
7011 S. 19th Street
Tacoma, WA 98466
ph: 253/565-6600
fx: 253/620-7235
-----------------------------------------------------------------------



-----Original Message-----
From: chris.slater@gmail.com [mailto:chris.slater@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Slater
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 13:04
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: Aspect Ratio of Light Framed Shearwalls

In the 97 UBC, shearwall aspect ratio had to be 2:1 in zone 4 and
could be 3.5:1 in zone 3.

I know that in the IBC, all SDC's have a limit on the aspect ratio of
2:1, but with the exception that smaller walls can be used if a
reduction in capacity is used.

Can someone point me to the applicable code?  I'm digging through my
2006 IBC and ASCE 7-05, but can't find this.

Thanks,

Chris Slater, PE

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

RE: CMU Infills

Chapter A5 of the IEBC provides rules for evaluation of concrete frame buildings with masonry infills.  This stuff is not for the easily discouraged.

 

Nels Roselund, SE

South San Gabriel, CA

 


From: Scott Maxwell [mailto:smaxwell@umich.edu]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 2:39 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: RE: CMU Infills

 

I don't recall if there are actual code provisions, but there are certainly FEMA documents that discussion the issue of masonry infill walls in frames and how to retrofit or even design for them.  If I recall correctly, the main thing to try to do is leave enough isolation room between the frame and the infill walls to allow the frame to deflect as "desired" without "engaging" the infill wall...OR design the frame for the types of forces that will be created due to "engaging" the infill walls.

 

Regards,

 

Scott

Adrian, MI

-----Original Message-----
From: Alex C. Nacionales [mailto:anacionales@insightts.net]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:02 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: CMU Infills

Dear Fellow Engineers,

 

     My RC design teacher has taught us has to ignore the effect of CMU infills on a RC frame because they will be crushed during a seismic event. Recent seminars I attended shows that cmu infills interferes with  frame action thus attracting more shear. Is there any code provision regarding on how to treat cmu infills in relation with RC frames or steel frames?

 

       Your assistance will much appreciated. Thanks.

 

 

     Sincerely,

 

     Alex C. Nacionales.

      

 

     

 

    

RE: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

I just spoke with a contractor who bought 23-1/2" x 1-1/8" Dia off the shelf from White Cap, He thought longer had to be ordered.
 
Jeff


From: coengineer@aim.com [mailto:coengineer@aim.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:45 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: Re: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

I believe Relton in So Cal manufactures these on a regular basis.  They sell through the usual suspects of construction material supply houses in the bay area (probably White Cap et al).  That is to go along with the CIA-GEL 7000 from Covert/USP right ? ; )

Howard Silverman, PE
USP Structural Connectors
hsilverman@USPconnectors.com
www.USPconnectors.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Rhkratzse@aol.com
To: seaint@seaint.org
Sent: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 6:22 pm
Subject: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

I need a little help.

Does anyone know of a source for long drill bits in the San Francisco Bay Area?  I mean to drill holes in existing concrete for new anchor rods to be epoxy-grouted into for residential earthquake retrofits, say 1" to 1-1/4" diameter up to about 30" or 36" long?

TIA,

Ralph



**************
Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548)

More new features than ever. Check out the new AIM(R) Mail!

RE: CMU Infills

I don't recall if there are actual code provisions, but there are certainly FEMA documents that discussion the issue of masonry infill walls in frames and how to retrofit or even design for them.  If I recall correctly, the main thing to try to do is leave enough isolation room between the frame and the infill walls to allow the frame to deflect as "desired" without "engaging" the infill wall...OR design the frame for the types of forces that will be created due to "engaging" the infill walls.
 
Regards,
 
Scott
Adrian, MI
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex C. Nacionales [mailto:anacionales@insightts.net]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 5:02 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: CMU Infills

Dear Fellow Engineers,
 
     My RC design teacher has taught us has to ignore the effect of CMU infills on a RC frame because they will be crushed during a seismic event. Recent seminars I attended shows that cmu infills interferes with  frame action thus attracting more shear. Is there any code provision regarding on how to treat cmu infills in relation with RC frames or steel frames?
 
       Your assistance will much appreciated. Thanks.
 
 
     Sincerely,
 
     Alex C. Nacionales.
      
 
     
 
    

CMU Infills

Dear Fellow Engineers,
 
     My RC design teacher has taught us has to ignore the effect of CMU infills on a RC frame because they will be crushed during a seismic event. Recent seminars I attended shows that cmu infills interferes with  frame action thus attracting more shear. Is there any code provision regarding on how to treat cmu infills in relation with RC frames or steel frames?
 
       Your assistance will much appreciated. Thanks.
 
 
     Sincerely,
 
     Alex C. Nacionales.
      
 
     
 
    

RE: Aspect Ratio of Light Framed Shearwalls

See Table 2305.3.4, footnote a of the 2006 IBC.

Tom

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thomas D. Skaggs, Ph.D., P.E.
Manager, Product Evaluation
Technical Services Division
APA - The Engineered Wood Association
7011 S. 19th Street
Tacoma, WA 98466
ph: 253/565-6600
fx: 253/620-7235
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: chris.slater@gmail.com [mailto:chris.slater@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Chris Slater
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 13:04
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: Aspect Ratio of Light Framed Shearwalls

In the 97 UBC, shearwall aspect ratio had to be 2:1 in zone 4 and
could be 3.5:1 in zone 3.

I know that in the IBC, all SDC's have a limit on the aspect ratio of
2:1, but with the exception that smaller walls can be used if a
reduction in capacity is used.

Can someone point me to the applicable code? I'm digging through my
2006 IBC and ASCE 7-05, but can't find this.

Thanks,

Chris Slater, PE

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Aspect Ratio of Light Framed Shearwalls

In the 97 UBC, shearwall aspect ratio had to be 2:1 in zone 4 and
could be 3.5:1 in zone 3.

I know that in the IBC, all SDC's have a limit on the aspect ratio of
2:1, but with the exception that smaller walls can be used if a
reduction in capacity is used.

Can someone point me to the applicable code? I'm digging through my
2006 IBC and ASCE 7-05, but can't find this.

Thanks,

Chris Slater, PE

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

RE: Slab On Grade STAAD Model

Bill,

 

I suggest using Staad for your application; model it through FE (finite element). To run the analysis Staad requires a sub grade modulus reaction (see below as an example in load input data). Caution with the units used you may need to convert as I just shown below.

 

SUPPORTS

*Subgrade modulus reaction is assumed 100pci (from geotech)

*for staad input (100pci*144in^2/ft^2*12in/ft)(kip/1000 lbs)=172.8

1 TO 2323 FIXED BUT KFX 172.8 KFY 172.8 KFZ 172.8

 

 

PC mat is a handy tool to use.

 

Good Luck!

 

Engr. Julius Micayas

P.E. license no.32969

Project Manager/Sr. Lead Structural Engineer

River Consulting LLC

111 Veterans Memorial Boulevard

               Suite 1600

Metairie, Louisiana 70005

Phone - 504-841-3014 (direct)

504 837-5275 (office)

Fax - 504-837-2986

E-mail: jmicayas@riverconsulting.com

W-page:            www.riverconsulting.com


From: Bill Allen [mailto:T.W.Allen@cox.net]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 12:05 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: Slab On Grade STAAD Model

 

I am having some difficulty modeling a slab on grade using STAAD. The slab is 20 ft. x 12 ft. x 3-1/2” thick. I am putting a point load (uplift) at one corner. I would also like to put another load at the middle of the long edge. I don’t model in STAAD very often, so I’m pretty sure I’m doing something wrong. I’m using Plate Mat foundation compression only supports, but I keep getting tension on some of the supports. When I put two corner loads and the load at the middle of the long edge (twice the corner load), the whole thing blows up even though the slab weight is greater than the uplift force.

 

If anyone has the time and inclination to look at my model, I would be most appreciative. FWIW, I’m using STAAD 2004. That’s how seldom I do modeling anymore.

 

TIA,

 

T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E.

ALLEN DESIGNS

Consulting Structural Engineers
 
V (949) 248-8588 F(949) 209-2509

Slab On Grade STAAD Model

I am having some difficulty modeling a slab on grade using STAAD. The slab is 20 ft. x 12 ft. x 3-1/2” thick. I am putting a point load (uplift) at one corner. I would also like to put another load at the middle of the long edge. I don’t model in STAAD very often, so I’m pretty sure I’m doing something wrong. I’m using Plate Mat foundation compression only supports, but I keep getting tension on some of the supports. When I put two corner loads and the load at the middle of the long edge (twice the corner load), the whole thing blows up even though the slab weight is greater than the uplift force.

 

If anyone has the time and inclination to look at my model, I would be most appreciative. FWIW, I’m using STAAD 2004. That’s how seldom I do modeling anymore.

 

TIA,

 

T. William (Bill) Allen, S.E.

ALLEN DESIGNS

Consulting Structural Engineers
 
V (949) 248-8588 F(949) 209-2509

Re: Retaining Wall Problem

Irv,

I came across a product catalog call Super Stud. No, it's not a male enhancement product, it's a temporary steel shoring system. It's like a big erector set. Might do the job...

It's not a 1-time thing, it's something a contractor could re-use, so you may need to find someone who has the setup already.

http://www.efcoforms.com/pages_products/products/super_stud.html

hth,
-gm

On Jan 24, 2008 7:14 AM, IRV FRUCHTMAN <ifaeng@yahoo.com> wrote:
Dear Fellow Engineers:
San Francisco friends asked me about a problem re a
new home they are  building in the city. It will be
located on a steep hill tucked in between two existing
homes and will require excavation and retaining walls.
To minimize construction cost and lost floor space, my
friends' shoring engineer designed a tied-back
retaining wall for the uphill side that also underpins
the uphill neighbor's home foundation. The height of
the retaining wall will vary from 4 to 15 feet. It
uses helical anchors to tie back the wall; these will
also run beneath the neighbor's home. The excavation
is done starting from the top and working downwards in
segments. In each segment steel reinforcing is placed
and shotcrete is sprayed against the exposed dirt.

1. Do you have concerns with this excavation /
retaining wall design?

2. So far the uphill neighbor hasn't agreed to
authorize work under his home; any suggestions on how
to convince him to allow the work?

I'd appreciate your opinions.
Irv



     ____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile.  Try it now.  http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
*   Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
*   This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
*   Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
*   subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*   http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
*   Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
*   send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
*   without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
*   site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********



--
-gm

RE: Retaining Wall Problem

It is common in SF to resist growth, making it a bad place to consider
investment for development. You are unlikely to gain access under
another's building to allow land improvements.

I understand that the steel corkscrews have a shorter life than those
systems that encase the tie rod in concrete. Maybe a permanent electric
charge could reduce the "chance" of corrosion.

In SF, I end up using opposing retaining walls with floors in
compression. I prefer concrete on metal deck floors but wood systems can
be considered. The problem with wood floors is that one edge is usually
without a retaining wall and so high shear forces are developed in the
diaphragm to transfer to the sides with RWs

It is nearly impossible to not have retaining wall forces transfer into
floors because the settling lateral deflections of a 14 foot RW. I see
that the new Simpson has a solution for the new code requirement of
extra connections for the wood sill to the top of a RW.

SF has expansive clays cantilever systems will move.

A crack survey of neighboring properties will limit the cost of
repairing cracking to just new cracks. This is a process where all
evidence of movement and cracking is measured and photographed and
reported with the fact that every wall, floor and foundation length was
inspected and that no evidence was missed. If the neighbor refuses entry
for a crack survey the refusal can be used as evidence of a hostile
neighbor.

David Merrick, SE

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: A Welding question

On Jan 25, 2008, at 1:38 AM, Ed Najjarine, SE wrote:

> I have a situation where we specified an aluminum
> railing system consisting of welded members. The
> system is manufactured in china and shipped to the US
> for installation. what kinds of tests should we
> request to insure that foreign welding is appropriate.
Tough job. If it were a pressure vessel job, I'd request copies of
all the QA documents, the welding procedures and procedure
qualifications. Then I'd probably do some quick met testing over here
to make sure the materials themselves are what the supplier said they
were. I'd also request design documents showing that the original
designers knew enough about aluminum design. And because I'm a bit
nosy, I'm real curious why you specified the system without some
guarantee that the system would be welded properly and that it would
meet the Aluminum Association structural spec. If you've already
contracted for the railing, any testing you do may be irrelevant if
it's not in the original purchase documents.

Welding aluminum isn't exactly rocket science, but it has to be done
properly or you get serious problems. Aluminum undergoes a
significant loss in strength when it's welded and there may be a loss
in ductility depending on the welding consumables. There can be
distortion issues and because aluminum has a low melting temperature,
sometimes there are procedural problems.

OTOH, I've been riding a bike with a welded aluminum frame and put
about 7000 miles on it and it's done pretty well. The bike was
designed in the US and made in Taiwan, although it appears that each
frame was welded and heat treated to restore the strength of the
aluminum, presumably by the manufacturer. This isn't your everyday
approach to aluminum welding but it seems to work out.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw@skypoint.com | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania
1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/~chrisw/

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

RE: [SPAM] Re: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

Another source is Orco Construction Supply.

 


From: Tom.Hunt@fluor.com [mailto:Tom.Hunt@fluor.com]
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 7:00 AM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: [SPAM] Re: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

 


Ralph,

Contact your local HILTI representative.  They have all sorts of equipment that can drill this type of hole.  I had a similar situation where we used a HILTI rotary percussion drill mounted on a tripod and once it was set up it took only about 30 seconds to drill each hole.  This was a large metal frame building where we swear the anchor bolts were originally installed by a blind man on a pogo stick.

Thomas Hunt


 

Rhkratzse@aol.com
01/24/2008 06:22 PM
Please respond to seaint

To

seaint@seaint.org

cc

 

Subject

Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

 

 

 




I need a little help.

Does anyone know of a source for long drill bits in the San Francisco Bay Area?  I mean to drill holes in existing concrete for new anchor rods to be epoxy-grouted into for residential earthquake retrofits, say 1" to 1-1/4" diameter up to about 30" or 36" long?

TIA,

Ralph



**************
Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548)

------------------------------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person 
or entity to which it is addressed and may contain 
proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.  
If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are 
hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination, 
distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon 
this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please 
contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.  
 
Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual 
sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.  
------------------------------------------------------------

re: alumn handrails from China

Ed,
I will stay away from a political discussion, but I have read lots of things about lack of quality metals and welds from China so just be cautious the whole way on this thing.
 
Also, we do engineering for steel and aluminium fabricators, and have had lots of issues making handrails work for the code lateral loads, especially when you get down to the posts. The rails themselves are usually OK. Also, aluminium welds decrease the strength of the base metal so you have to decrease your allowable stress of the material, and often the posts are welded to a base plate of some sort. We have had to tell our fabricator clients in spite of what they have done in the past they now have to use a bigger post, bigger welds, a sleeve over the post to get more section, etc.
 
Run the numbers if you are signing and sealing.... Or have them tested for the code loads but I don't know how that kind of testing works.
 
 
Andrew Kester, P.E.
Principal/Project Manager
ADK Structural Engineering, PLLC
1510 E. Colonial Ave., Suite 301
Orlando, FL 32803

Re: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?


Ralph,

Contact your local HILTI representative.  They have all sorts of equipment that can drill this type of hole.  I had a similar situation where we used a HILTI rotary percussion drill mounted on a tripod and once it was set up it took only about 30 seconds to drill each hole.  This was a large metal frame building where we swear the anchor bolts were originally installed by a blind man on a pogo stick.

Thomas Hunt



Rhkratzse@aol.com
01/24/2008 06:22 PM
Please respond to seaint
To
seaint@seaint.org
cc
Subject
Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?





I need a little help.

Does anyone know of a source for long drill bits in the San Francisco Bay Area?  I mean to drill holes in existing concrete for new anchor rods to be epoxy-grouted into for residential earthquake retrofits, say 1" to 1-1/4" diameter up to about 30" or 36" long?

TIA,

Ralph



**************
Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548)

------------------------------------------------------------ The information transmitted is intended only for the person  or entity to which it is addressed and may contain  proprietary, business-confidential and/or privileged material.   If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are  hereby notified that any use, review, retransmission, dissemination,  distribution, reproduction or any action taken in reliance upon  this message is prohibited. If you received this in error, please  contact the sender and delete the material from any computer.    Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual  sender and may not necessarily reflect the views of the company.   ------------------------------------------------------------ 

Re: ASCE 7-08

IMO, all the changes has been driven by (what else?) money. In the
early sixties, when A36 came out, there was a big push to build higher
buildings to take advantage of limited real estate. The concrete
industry responded by striving for higher strength concretes and trying
to prove that they could build higher buildings also. Likewise, the
asphalt paving industry versus the concrete slab industry in roads. I
am sure that safety was always a consideration, but as I remember the
main driving force was competition, i.e. the dollar.
Gary

Jordan Truesdell, PE wrote:
> There _was_ a smiley on the end of that sentence, but... presuming
> concrete hasn't changed, yes. Physics, in the realm that we deal,
> hasn't changed. NACA airfoils developed in mid 20th century still
> provide the same lift that they did back then, so air hasn't changed
> either.
>
> I can't argue that lumber has changed, but the laws of mechanics
> hasn't. If you want to update material properties, be my guest. If
> you ask me to do 5 hours of calculations to come up with an answer
> that is 5-10% away from the one I can do in 3 minutes with a pencil,
> I'd rather you not prohibit me from using the old version.
>
> I'm fine with advancement which materially increases safety or
> simplifies the job of design (thereby reducing the possibility of
> errors, and ultimately increasing safety), but many changes don't seem
> to be falling into either category. Things seem to be changing for
> the sake of change (oooh, pretty-shiny!) - where lives are at stake,
> I'm not a big proponent of that mindset.
> Jordan
>
>
> Ralph Kratz wrote:
>> I guess you're (facitiously) suggesting that if the 1962 ACI code (my
>> first) had been "right" we wouldn't have had to have all these
>> revisions since then, right? :)
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jan 23, 2008, at 4:06 PM, "Jordan Truesdell, PE"
>> <seaint2@truesdellengineering.com
>> <mailto:seaint2@truesdellengineering.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Why not do it right the first time? Then we wouldn't need cycles at
>>> all.;-)
>>> Jordan
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read
>>> list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was
>>> sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern
>>> California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe,
>>> please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions
>>> to seaint-ad@seaint.org <mailto:seaint-ad@seaint.org>. Remember, any
>>> email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted *
>>> without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at:
>>> http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ******
>>> ****** ********
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read
> list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was
> sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern
> California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe,
> please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to
> seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is
> public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make
> sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ******
> ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: steel studs on columns?

Harold,
Me too. I visited a pipe valve shop once and had my eyes opened by the
quality of the welds on the fittings, all from one side. On the other
hand, on one of my jobs, the contractor got a cheap price from an ASME
qualfied shop to do some structural work which is not allowed in Canada
unless they have also been approved by the Canadian Welding Bureau for
structural welding ( they weren't). A lot of the welds were terrible
and they had no idea of what structural connections were required.
Needless to say I kicked them off the job, despite great howls of
protest-"we have been welding X number of years". They just weren't
qualified or approved for structural.
This is not to knock them as pipe welders, just to say "to each his own".
Gary

Harold Sprague wrote:
> Your uncle belongs to a class of welders held in high regard among
> those who make sparks. Pipers and millwrights can weld much better
> than structural welders. The root weld on pipe is a gap in a bevel
> weld that has no backer. The welder moves his arc back and forth with
> no backing and his weld is a vertical weld transferring to an overhead
> weld and the transferring to a down weld.
>
> If any of my structural welding friends gets a little too confident, I
> challenge them to weld some pipe. I certainly know my place and would
> never even try making a piping weld. I am not worthy.
>
> Regards,
> Harold Sprague
>
>
> From: akester@cfl.rr.com
> To: seaint@seaint.org
> Subject: steel studs on columns?
> Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 12:27:45 -0500
>
> While flying up to watch my poor Packers lose this last weekend, I
> saw some new steel framing at the Orlando Airport that made me
> curious. It looks to be a two story steel frame, perhaps moment
> frame on the second story to roof level. On the first story level,
> the wide flange columns had steel studs welded to them at maybe
> 12" o.c. to at least two sides of column. This appeared to be at a
> corner column. My only guess is they are going to tie into the
> column with a concrete tie column or wall and use a CMU or
> concrete wall for lateral bracing on the first floor. But I would
> think if this were the case the top few studs would see all of the
> force, that the column would not be stiff enough to transfer all
> of the force into the wall element very evenly.
>
> And per all of that talk on field welding... Talking with my
> uncle, a retired steam fitter, they weld huge steel pipes together
> with butt splice complete joint penetration bevel welds, in the
> middle of a Wisconsin winter, all of the time... These pipes carry
> water and steam and may not have the stress in them that a wide
> flange butt welded will have, but I think as structural engineers
> we don't have to be so scared of field welding if it is really
> necessary! (Though may avoid it when it is not necessary due to
> costs.)
>
> Andrew
>
> Andrew Kester, PE
> Principal/Project Manager
> ADK Structural Engineering, PLLC
> 1510 E Colonial Ave., Suite 301
> Orlando, FL 32803
>
>
> Climb to the top of the charts! Play the word scramble challenge with
> star power. Play now!
> <http://club.live.com/star_shuffle.aspx?icid=starshuffle_wlmailtextlink_jan>

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

RE: A Welding question

Start at the beginning.

Specify - that allwelding is in accordance with ANSI/AWS D1.2/D1.2M:2003.
Structural Welding Code - Aluminum. Edition: 4th American Welding Society

Request a copy for approval of the Welding Procedures, Welder Qualification
Records and Proceedure Qualification Records befor any welding is done

Require 100% Visual Inspection.

Depending on joint configuration, complexity and your application specify
Liquid Penetrant and/or Ultrasonic inspection

Richard M. Beldyk PhD, PE
Engineering Manager
Aerisyn, LLC

____________________________________________________________________________
_____________
From: "Ed Najjarine, SE" <en@najjarinestructures.com>
Subject: A Welding question
To: seaint@seaint.org

Dear fellow Engineers,

I have a situation where we specified an aluminum
railing system consisting of welded members. The
system is manufactured in china and shipped to the US
for installation. what kinds of tests should we
request to insure that foreign welding is appropriate.

Thanks in advance.

Ed Najjarine, SE
Irvine, CA


--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web LIVE – Free email based on Microsoft® Exchange technology -
http://link.mail2web.com/LIVE

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Thursday, January 24, 2008

A Welding question

Dear fellow Engineers,

I have a situation where we specified an aluminum
railing system consisting of welded members. The
system is manufactured in china and shipped to the US
for installation. what kinds of tests should we
request to insure that foreign welding is appropriate.

Thanks in advance.

Ed Najjarine, SE
Irvine, CA


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

RE: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

Ralph,

One of the contractors that worked on a job of mine used a concrete coring company.

Marlou B Rodriguez, S.E.
Mbrodriguez Engineering Inc.


-----Original Message-----
From: Rhkratzse@aol.com <Rhkratzse@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 7:03 PM
To: COEngineer@aim.com <COEngineer@aim.com>; seaint@seaint.org <seaint@seaint.org>
Subject: Re: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

Could be. :)

Thanks!

Ralph

In a message dated 1/24/08 6:51:00 PM, coengineer@aim.com writes:
> I believe Relton in So Cal manufactures these on a regular basis. They
> sell through the usual suspects of construction material supply houses in the
> bay area (probably White Cap et al). That is to go along with the CIA-GEL 7000
> from Covert/USP right ? ; )
>
> Howard Silverman, PE
> USP Structural Connectors
> hsilverman@USPconnectors.com
> www.USPconnectors.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rhkratzse@aol.com
> To: seaint@seaint.org
> Sent: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 6:22 pm
> Subject: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?
>
> I need a little help.
>
> Does anyone know of a source for long drill bits in the San Francisco Bay
> Area? I mean to drill holes in existing concrete for new anchor rods to be
> epoxy-grouted into for residential earthquake retrofits, say 1" to 1-1/4"
> diameter up to about 30" or 36" long?
>
> TIA,
>
> Ralph


**************
Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.


(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548)

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: acceptable bend radius for a cable or tendon?

Depending upon the rope. for a 7x7 rope, 42 times the rope
diameter. For a 18x7, non-rotating, 36 times the rope
diameter. Also check with the rope manufacture.


Neil Moore, SE, SECB
neil moore and associates
consulting structural engineers
shingle springs, ca


>How do you determine an acceptable bend radius for tension only cable? I
>know for elevators they are switching to kevlar rope because it does not need
>as big diameter and heavy of pulleys.
>
>If you have a 3.5 or 4" diameter tension cable [not embedded in concrete] how
>sharply can it safely bend in it's final state?


******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*

http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org

******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********

Re: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

Could be.  :)

Thanks!

Ralph

In a message dated 1/24/08 6:51:00 PM, coengineer@aim.com writes:
I believe Relton in So Cal manufactures these on a regular basis.  They sell through the usual suspects of construction material supply houses in the bay area (probably White Cap et al).  That is to go along with the CIA-GEL 7000 from Covert/USP right ? ; )

Howard Silverman, PE
USP Structural Connectors
hsilverman@USPconnectors.com
www.USPconnectors.com


-----Original Message-----
From: Rhkratzse@aol.com
To: seaint@seaint.org
Sent: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 6:22 pm
Subject: Source for long drill bits in S.F. Bay Area ?

I need a little help.

Does anyone know of a source for long drill bits in the San Francisco Bay Area?  I mean to drill holes in existing concrete for new anchor rods to be epoxy-grouted into for residential earthquake retrofits, say 1" to 1-1/4" diameter up to about 30" or 36" long?

TIA,

Ralph



**************
Biggest Grammy Award surprises of all time on AOL Music.
(http://music.aol.com/grammys/pictures/never-won-a-grammy?NCID=aolcmp00300000002548)