I assume that is still the case, but it could have changed. You can
always call and ask the Licensing Office. I don't believe they consider
that part as "top secret", so to speak.
Regards,
Scott
Adrian, MI
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Bill S. Marczewski wrote:
> Does anybody know if it is mandatory on the Washington State SE-III Exam to
> answer BOTH building and bridge questions? The state provided exam format
> is somewhat vague. The NCEES SE-II exam allowed the examinee to choose
> their area of specialty. Does Washington require you to work through both
> building and bridge questions? If so, how critical is it to have the latest
> and greatest amendments of the WSDOT Bridge Design Manual?
>
>
>
> Any input that does not constitute "collusion" according to the examiners
> would be greatly appreciated.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bill Marczewski
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*
http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********