Jordan,
Pure cantilevers .............. but, I figured it out. I have been using Af as the total backstop area, not the area of the mesh, verticals, and horizontals. HUGE difference.
Brian
----- Original Message -----From: Jordan Truesdell, PESent: Wednesday, July 18, 2007 9:32 AMSubject: Re: Backstop DesignAre you considering the posts as pure cantilevers, or are you taking the frame action into account?Jordan
Brian K. Smith wrote:******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at: http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
I am in the process of designing a backstop for a high school athletic
field. 100mph wind loading, 27'-5" high. I determined my wind pressures
using ASCE 7, assuming an epsilon of 0.192 (2x2 6 ga. mesh). My average
wind pressure (total force over area) came out to be around 17.7 psf, which
for a cantilevered 27.5' post at 8' or 10' is huge. I was originally
assuming I would have 4" diameter schedule 40 post at 10' on center; but now
I'm coming up with 8" A53 pipe at 8' on center. Am I missing something?
Brian K. Smith, P.E.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.8/906 - Release Date: 7/17/2007 6:30 PM