responsible Engineer had at a minimum touched the engineered document and
that some other person did not issued the document without the consent of
the responsible engineer. The electronic signature makes rubber stamping
infraction just too easy. So a faxed copy of a seal document is legitimate
as I see it as much as a photocopy of a stamped document is legit.
Rand
"Jerry Coombs"
<JCoombs@carollo.
com> To
<seaint@seaint.org>
08/15/2007 06:44 cc
AM
Subject
Re: Texas PE
Please respond to
<seaint@seaint.or
g>
The original document must be signed, sealed, and *transmitted*. It may be
followed by a facsimile of whatever sort, but there must be a real paper
trail to the original, to the person distributing them. One fuzzy area
that is not explicit, but seems acceptable, is to fax a sealed addendum,
correction, etc; but these should really be followed by a hard copy, too.
>>> "Jordan Truesdell, PE" <seaint1@truesdellengineering.com> 8/15/2007
6:22 AM >>>
I've been away for a bit, and didn't get a chance to reply earlier. Does
this mean that you cannot fax a sealed document? And for the prohibition,
does it apply to sending the document or to the validity of the sent
document?
Jordan
Jerry Coombs wrote:
If you can't find a blank, I may be able to strip name/ number from
mine and send. Keep in mind that it is NOT ALLOWED in Texas, as in
many states, to transmit a signed stamp electronically.
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* *** * Read list FAQ
at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp * * This email was sent to you via
Structural Engineers * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server.
To * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to: * *
http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp * * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org.
Remember, any email you * send to the list is public domain and may be
re-posted * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web * site at:
http://www.seaint.org ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ******
******** (See attached file: att693a8.dat)