In a message dated 2/28/2008 1:50:31 PM Pacific Standard Time, d.topete73@gmail.com writes:
I stand corrected. my apologies if I lead you down a slippery slope.
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 1:29 PM, <Jnapd@aol.com> wrote:
DaveIn a message dated 2/28/2008 10:03:16 AM Pacific Standard Time, d.topete73@gmail.com writes:Joe,
I suggest running a second analysis for the 60' from the crest. There may be a significant difference with H= 1,060' with z = 1,000' as opposed to H= 1,500'. GL.Your saying that z is the roof height above the lowest ground level not the height of the building. All the examples I have seen have used z as the height of the building.Joe Venuti
Johnson & Nielsen Associates
Palm Springs, CA
Joe Venuti
Johnson & Nielsen Associates
Palm Springs, CA
Johnson & Nielsen Associates
Palm Springs, CA
Delicious ideas to please the pickiest eaters. Watch the video on AOL Living.