lightly loaded footings.
Will H.
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Gerard Madden, SE <gmse4603@gmail.com> wrote:
> sorry, erase the "but not" in paragraph 2 line 2...
>
> -gm <--- DUM DUM
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Gerard Madden, SE <gmse4603@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> In the UBC, you could avoid minimum steel in footings if you provided
>> 1/3rd more than required for strength.
>>
>> In the new code, I think that's been stricken and you must at least comply
>> with temp steel requirements but not per ACI 318 section 10.5.4 & You do not
>> have to meet ACD 10.5.1 for min flex steel.
>>
>> Is that the case? It's been a while since I went diving thru an ACI
>> (college) so maybe I'm missing something.
>>
>> TIA
>> -gm
>
>
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
*
http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********