the mid-atlantic, so I tend to be more at leisure to use a rational
engineering process. Abandoning the obvious calculation method for a
shoe-horned procedure that may not really applicable - but will not
confuse a poorly educated code checker - must be very frustrating.
Jordan
Dennis Wish wrote:
> Jordan,
> While I thank you for the information, I think selling this method to a
> local residential building plan checker is going to raise more questions
> about compliance with what section of the code that is applicable than it is
> worth. <snip>
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********