after somebody at the drop of a hat to protect their turf.
Gary
ASLCSE@aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 10/2/2008 9:15:16 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> h.d.richardson@shaw.ca writes:
>
> The "building facility maintenance operator" can be
> prosecuted for using the term "engineer"; the "locomotive
> operator" can not because, unfortunately, their people invented
> the term before ours did.
>
>
> I don't think he can be prosecuted for using the title ENGINEER
> (without a branch)
> My 2 cents worth
>
> Antonio S. "Tony" Luisoni
> Consulting SE
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking for simple solutions to your real-life financial challenges?
> Check out WalletPop for the latest news and information, tips and
> calculators
> <http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1209382257x1200540686/aol?redir=http://www.walletpop.com/?NCID=emlcntuswall00000001>.
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********