Thursday, March 12, 2009

Re: Point supported glass design

On Mar 12, 2009, at 11:39 PM, Thor Tandy wrote:

> If I use principal stresses they generally seem to come out lower
> than the
> von Mises so I'm conservative anyway.
The hooker is to judge whether the stress you're looking at tensile
or compressive. Glass does a much better job of handling compression
unless you're looking at buckling. But if you're talking about flat
panels compression and tension are equal, unless you're addressing a
flaw on the tension side.

Christopher Wright P.E. |"They couldn't hit an elephant at
chrisw@skypoint.com | this distance" (last words of Gen.
.......................................| John Sedgwick, Spotsylvania
1864)
http://www.skypoint.com/members/chrisw/

******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********