Re: About my WTC paper

Gregory,
I would also appreciate to get your paper.
Alan.jalil@socotec.fr
Many thanks in advance,
Alan JALIL
SE

Alan JALIL -----Mob+33 6 60 41 76 48-----Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

---

From: nma <nma@nma-se.com>

Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 20:01:48 -0700

To: <seaint@seaint.org>

ReplyTo: <seaint@seaint.org>

Subject: Re: About my WTC paper

Gregory:

I would also like a copy of your paper.

Thank you,

Neil Moore, SE


On 8/21/2011 1:33 AM, gregory szuladzinski wrote:

POINT ANSWERED:

 

Harold,

 

I am sending you a copy as to everyone else, who requested it.

The idea is to give you a stimulating Sunday reading.

(Here, Down Under, it is already Sunday night, while you have your Sunday waiting for you.

Good life there!.)

If you did not receive yours, pls let me know.

 

I use info contained in FEMA report.

The purpose is to derive collapse time, based on structural reasoning.

This variable (duration) was not prominent in FEMA report, so disagreement is not an issue.

 

But, between you and me, I think FEMA invastigation was inadequate.

 

(If you watched the chief speak, you would notice his terminology was not that of an engineering specialist.)

 

Gregory from Oz

 

 

POINT RAISED:

 

I would like a copy.  I take it that you disagree with the NIST report.  ht=
tp://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=3D861610

Regards=2C Harold Sprague
=20