Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Re: WTC collapses

Now we will get all of the list's lurkers out of heir foxholes!

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 1:42 PM, Brian S Bossley, P.E. <bsbossley@gmail.com> wrote:

I would like a copy as well.


From: gregory szuladzinski [mailto:ggg@bigpond.net.au]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 4:34 AM
To: Sseaint Org
Subject: WTC collapses


As far as Building 7 collapse, there is no better explanation than controlled demolition

You can question the qualification of the presenter, but this does not undermine the above statement.


As for the towers themselves, mechanical damage plus subsequent action of fire

could have done it. (Don't forget the oxygen content of the plane, which makes a furnace

out of the area.) But there is a problem. No way to explain, on structural grounds,

why it collapsed as fast as it did.


On the rational side: as far as sounds of explosions are concerned, there is less of mysteries

than often implied by various writers.


My paper on the subject is about to be published.

If you let me know, I will send you a pre-print version.


Gregory from Oz


Alexander Bausk
Civil/Structural design & inspection engineer, CAD professional
MSc Structural engineering, Ph.C. Engineering
Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine
Tel. +38 068 4079692
Fax. +38 0562 470263