Monday, September 26, 2011

RE: Intellectual Property - Laws vs. Practice



This is bigger than what you suggest. There is a plethora of intellectual property products developed in a typical engineering office. Spreadsheets are pretty obvious because we all seem to be thinking about IT IP a lot these days. The “gold mine” is general notes, specifications, details, and all that other stuff that gets us through a design project. Can you imagine if the Hardy-Cross method was developed at an engineering firm that strictly protected its intellectual property? Are there other processes and procedures that we develop in the course of business that others might use to economic advantage? My guess is that Armageddon is coming to construction engineering IP; it’s just a matter of when and who fires the first volley.


Keith Fix

Red Pepper Consulting, Inc.


From: []
Sent: Monday, September 26, 2011 11:02 AM
Subject: Intellectual Property - Laws vs. Practice


The listserve has been pretty quiet lately, so I thought I’d see if I can stir up a discussion about something that’s been on my mind:  Some recent events at our company have prompted some discussion about intellectual property pertaining to the development and use of an engineer’s spreadsheets (or similar tools – programs, Mathcad or Tedds templates, etc. – but I’ll refer to them all as “spreadsheets”).  My understanding is that the IP laws would say that if an engineer develops a spreadsheet to design or analyze something while in the employment of a company, this is considered “work for hire”, and the spreadsheet is owned by the company.  If the engineer leaves, the spreadsheet is to remain with the employer.  However, my experience has been that structural engineers typically ignore such laws and company policies, and assemble over the course of their careers a library of spreadsheets, some of which they have developed themselves and others that they have inherited from coworkers, previous employees, Web sites, etc.  We also tend to add to others’ libraries of spreadsheet tools by sharing things that we have developed with coworkers or even friends who may work at other firms.  Consequently, there’s a pool full of spreadsheets floating around in the structural community, any portion of which may be in use at any given company at any given time.


Is my experience consistent with what you’ve experienced in your careers?  Do you agree that a company should own the spreadsheets of its employees developed during the course of employment?  Do your companies typically try to enforce the laws to keep such intellectual property protected?  Is there any simple way to do that?  If they try to protect their IP, do they also respect the IP of others, and ask an incoming employee to leave behind any tools that they may have in their library, and only use those that are developed while in the current engagement?


I’d be interested in hearing your thoughts and experiences.


-- Joel


Joel Adair   PE, LEED® AP BD+C
Lead Structural Engineer

SHW Group

Plano, TX