Sunday, August 21, 2011

RE: WTC collapses

Same here please.

ralph@rstavares.com

Thank you,

 

From: Jack Moore [mailto:jmasales@quik-set.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 7:22 AM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: RE: WTC collapses

 

Please send a copy to:

Jack Moore

Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: John H. Cato, jr. R.A. [mailto:jcato@accessatc.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 3:58 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: Re: WTC collapses

Same here.

TIA,

-- john
John H. Cato, jr, R.A.
Nicholls, GA

On 8/20/2011 2:41 PM, Thor Tandy wrote:

If I may, I would like a copy too.

Thanks

Thor A. Tandy P.Eng, C.Eng, Struct.Eng, MIStructE
Victoria, BC
Canada

From: Harold Sprague [mailto:spraguehope@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 11:05 AM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: RE: WTC collapses

I would like a copy.  I take it that you disagree with the NIST report.  http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610

Regards, Harold Sprague
 

From: ggg@bigpond.net.au
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: WTC collapses
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:33:44 +1000

As far as Building 7 collapse, there is no better explanation than controlled demolition

You can question the qualification of the presenter, but this does not undermine the above statement.

As for the towers themselves, mechanical damage plus subsequent action of fire

could have done it. (Don't forget the oxygen content of the plane, which makes a furnace

out of the area.) But there is a problem. No way to explain, on structural grounds,

why it collapsed as fast as it did.

On the rational side: as far as sounds of explosions are concerned, there is less of mysteries

than often implied by various writers.

My paper on the subject is about to be published.

If you let me know, I will send you a pre-print version.

Gregory from Oz

at