Sunday, August 21, 2011

Re: WTC collapses

Same here.

TIA,
Randall Moore PE SE

From: Ralph Tavares <ralph@rstavares.com>
To: seaint@seaint.org
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 10:52 AM
Subject: RE: WTC collapses

Message
Same here please.
ralph@rstavares.com
Thank you,
 
From: Jack Moore [mailto:jmasales@quik-set.com]
Sent: Sunday, August 21, 2011 7:22 AM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: RE: WTC collapses
 
Please send a copy to:
Jack Moore
Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: John H. Cato, jr. R.A. [mailto:jcato@accessatc.net]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 3:58 PM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: Re: WTC collapses
Same here.

TIA,

-- john
John H. Cato, jr, R.A.
Nicholls, GA

On 8/20/2011 2:41 PM, Thor Tandy wrote:
If I may, I would like a copy too.
Thanks
Thor A. Tandy P.Eng, C.Eng, Struct.Eng, MIStructE
Victoria, BC
Canada
From: Harold Sprague [mailto:spraguehope@hotmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 20, 2011 11:05 AM
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: RE: WTC collapses
I would like a copy.  I take it that you disagree with the NIST report.  http://www.nist.gov/customcf/get_pdf.cfm?pub_id=861610

Regards, Harold Sprague
 
From: ggg@bigpond.net.au
To: seaint@seaint.org
Subject: WTC collapses
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:33:44 +1000
As far as Building 7 collapse, there is no better explanation than controlled demolition
You can question the qualification of the presenter, but this does not undermine the above statement.
As for the towers themselves, mechanical damage plus subsequent action of fire
could have done it. (Don't forget the oxygen content of the plane, which makes a furnace
out of the area.) But there is a problem. No way to explain, on structural grounds,
why it collapsed as fast as it did.
On the rational side: as far as sounds of explosions are concerned, there is less of mysteries
than often implied by various writers.
My paper on the subject is about to be published.
If you let me know, I will send you a pre-print version.
Gregory from Oz


at