pours. In the latter case, used self-consolidating concrete (no way to
vibrate internally that far down, and external vibrators rejected due
to the sketchy conditions with the bracing shaking loose) and did a lot
of set time testing to control the form pressures.........
-----Original Message-----
From: gtg740p <gtg740p@gmail.com>
To: <seaint@seaint.org> <seaint@seaint.org>
Sent: Mon, Nov 7, 2011 6:49 am
Subject: Re: HIGH CLEAR HEIGHT CONCRETE WALLS
It's not planned for one pour.
WH
On Nov 6, 2011, at 3:52 PM, Jay Shilstone <j2008.s@shilstone.com> wrote:
> I hope you aren't planning on placing in a single pour. That would be
a recipe
for disaster. You will need multiple pours or slip form.
>
> Can't respond to engineering aspects since I am not an engineer.
>
> You might want to include a comment on the geometry of the building.
I figure
rectangular but round is easier to brace.
>
> Jay Shilstone
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Nov 6, 2011, at 2:05 PM, William Haynes <gtg740p@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can anyone tell me what construction difficulties may be encountered
for a
building that is around 90 feet clear height using poured concrete?
Shipping on
precast this long would be an issue and I don't see it practical to
create
continuity in precast if using stacked modules. I am concerned with the
cost of
bracing the high poured walls during construction as they are being
built and
figuring this cost into a preliminary cost estimate.
>>
>> Will Haynes
>
> ******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
> * Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
> *
> * This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
> * Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
> * subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
> *
> * http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
> *
> * Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
> * send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
> * without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
> * site at: http://www.seaint.org
> ******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********
******* ****** ******* ******** ******* ******* ******* ***
* Read list FAQ at: http://www.seaint.org/list_FAQ.asp
*
* This email was sent to you via Structural Engineers
* Association of Southern California (SEAOSC) server. To
* subscribe (no fee) or UnSubscribe, please go to:
*
* http://www.seaint.org/sealist1.asp
*
* Questions to seaint-ad@seaint.org. Remember, any email you
* send to the list is public domain and may be re-posted
* without your permission. Make sure you visit our web
* site at: http://www.seaint.org
******* ****** ****** ****** ******* ****** ****** ********